Anti Ann Coulter – The rightwing mouthpiece and the logical way to disseminate her column

Posted in Uncategorized by funnyindian on the November 20th, 2006

My retorts are in red !! 

History was made this week! For the first time in four election cycles, Democrats are not attacking the Diebold Corp. the day after the election, accusing it of rigging its voting machines. I guess Diebold has finally been vindicated.

Hardly !! If by being vindicated you mean being hacked like a copy of cheap South Carolina software then yes. They have been!! The real story is that the Democrats won DESPITE the Diebold machines.

So the left won the House and also Nicaragua. They’ve had a good week. At least they don’t have their finger on the atom bomb yet.
Soon Ann Soon !! And then maybe they will use the bomb that knocks on your door before it blows you with a Google Map and your address !!

Democrats support surrender in Iraq, higher taxes and the impeachment of President Bush. They just won an election by pretending to be against all three.

Its not surrender in Iraq . Its called ‘anything but what Rummy is doing’. People are dying. Troops are dying and Rummy keeps on making more Taliban soldiers than Bin Laden can bear to recruit.Higher Taxes. They said that didn’t they. And STILL the public voted them in !! What does that tell you ? The people are not stupid Ann. They actually know that with the Dems in power the gas prices will go down and that the taxes may go up but atleast that will mean that the fattest of fat white asses who get all the cuts will not get what the cheese anymore. Maybe people voted out of pshaudenfreud.

The impeachment of Bush –although a noble goal – will not be suitable to the rest of us. Why give the lame duck any more importance ?

Jon Tester, Bob Casey Jr., Heath Shuler, possibly Jim Webb — I’ve never seen so much raw testosterone in my life. The smell of sweaty jockstraps from the “new Democrats” is overwhelming.

Betcha you like smelly jockstraps. Atleast these jockstraps are not tainted with the blood of the innocent.
Having predicted this paltry Democrat win, my next prediction is how long it will take all these new “gun totin’ Democrats” to be fitted for leotards.
About as long as it takes Rev. Haggard to cure himself of his gayness !!
Now that they’ve won their elections and don’t have to deal with the hicks anymore, Tester can cut lose the infernal buzz cut, Casey can start taking “Emily’s List” money, and Webb can go back to writing more incestuously homoerotic fiction … and just in time for Christmas!

And Bush can go on killing minorities and ignoring hurricanes. And Rumsfeld can go on pretending he knew better than the generals on the ground , and Cheney can go on shooting people and ignoring what is best for his daughter just like last Christmas !! And Mark Foley can keep on molesting kids and Ted Haggard can advise the Whitehouse on conference calls while getting a blowjob from a gay hooker – let thee who have a free hand cast a stone !!

But according to the media, this week’s election results are a mandate for pulling out of Iraq (except in Connecticut where pro-war Joe Lieberman walloped anti-war “Ned the Red” Lamont).

One person Ann. Lincoln Chafey. They voted Anti Republican. We are on to your game and go back to the oil well you crawled out of !!

In fact, if the Democrats’ pathetic gains in a sixth-year election are a statement about the war in Iraq, Americans must love the war! As Roll Call put it back when Clinton was president: “Simply put, the party controlling the White House nearly always loses House seats in midterm elections” — especially in the sixth year.

Really so how did Clinton GAIN five seats in 1998 ???And they kept ALL the Senate seats while they were expected to lose FOUR. Only two presidents this century – Theodore Roosevelt in 1902 and Franklin Roosevelt in 1934 – have seen their parties make inroads in the House during mid-term elections. Seven presidents have seen gains in the Senate. Clinton was the third!!!

In Franklin D. Roosevelt’s sixth year in 1938, Democrats lost 71 seats in the House and six in the Senate.

In Dwight Eisenhower’s sixth year in 1958, Republicans lost 47 House seats, 13 in the Senate.

In John F. Kennedy/Lyndon Johnson’s sixth year, Democrats lost 47 seats in the House and three in the Senate.

In Richard Nixon/Gerald Ford’s sixth year in office in 1974, Republicans lost 43 House seats and three Senate seats.

Even America’s greatest president, Ronald Reagan, lost five House seats and eight Senate seats in his sixth year in office.

But in the middle of what the media tell us is a massively unpopular war, the Democrats picked up about 30 House seats and five to six Senate seats in a sixth-year election, with lots of seats still too close to call. Only for half-brights with absolutely no concept of yesterday is this a “tsunami” — as MSNBC calls it — rather than the death throes of a dying party.
Its called a take over. Or as Bush put it – a THUMPING !!!

During eight years of Clinton — the man Democrats tell us was the greatest campaigner ever, a political genius, a heartthrob, Elvis! — Republicans picked up a total of 49 House seats and nine Senate seats in two midterm elections. Also, when Clinton won the presidency in 1992, his party actually lost 10 seats in the House — only the second time in the 20th century that a party won the White House but lost seats in the House.
During eight years of Clinton — the man Democrats tell us was the greatest campaigner ever, a political genius, a heartthrob, Elvis! — Republicans picked up a total of 49 House seats and nine Senate seats in two midterm elections. Also, when Clinton won the presidency in 1992, his party actually lost 10 seats in the House — only the second time in the 20th century that a party won the White House but lost seats in the House.Once again the Democrats picked up five seats in the house in 1998.
Meanwhile, the Democrats’ epic victory this week, about which songs will be sung for generations, means that in two midterm elections Democrats were only able to pick up about 30 seats in the House and four seats in the Senate — and that’s assuming they pick up every seat that is currently too close to call. (The Democrats’ total gain is less than this week’s gain because Bush won six House and two Senate seats in the first midterm election.)
And once again I smell the ‘It should have been me out there’ sense of jealous righteous rage. Ann, go get laid once in a while and get that forced grin out of your face …Its SIX. Count with me 1, 2, 3,4,5,6 seats in the Senate and that’s after the Republicans stole Harrold Ford Jr.’s rightful seat with ugly mudslinging. How low can you guys go ?

So however you cut it, this midterm proves that the Iraq war is at least more popular than Bill Clinton was.

Not if you cut it like this.
Clinton was a morally reprehensible human being but still his nutsack alone could do a better job of being a President than Bush could. That’s how we roll .

In a choice between Republicans’ “Stay until we win” Iraq policy or the Democrats’ “Stay, leave … stay for a while then leave … redeploy and then come back … leave and stay … cut and run … win, lose or draw policy,” I guess Americans prefer the Republican policy.

No Ann. They are way too smart to fall for anything like that. Bush is still the Commander in Chief but we can’t wait for Senator McCain or Rudy Giuliani to do that for them.

The Democrats say we need a “new direction” in Iraq. Yeah, it’s called “reverse.”

Its not called reverse its called OVERSIGHT on a fat ugly Haliburton led oil spilling blood drinking machine !

Democrats keep talking about a new military strategy in Iraq. How exactly is cut-and-run a new strategy? The French have been doing it for years. The Democrats are calling their new plan for Iraq “Operation Somalia.”

Just like Republicans are calling their old plan for Iraq – Germany in Poland !!

The Democrats certainly have their work cut out for them. They have only two years to release as many terrorists as possible and lock up as many Republicans as they can. Republicans better get that body armor for the troops the Democrats are always carping about — and fast. The troops are going to need it for their backs.

See this is what you Rightwingers are all about . Taking the body armour from the troops and giving them to the Republicans. In fact your entire strategy for the war is What would the Republicans and their cronies win from this ? Come on !! If the insurgency in its last throes is causing this much trouble what would Iran do to us ? Not afraid but also don’t want to stir up a hornets nest unless we HAVE to and as the entire country told the Rightwingers in this election – we don’t agree. We don’t want your axis of evil analogies. We don’t want home spun stupidity and simplistic equations on complex situations where lives are lost . We don’t want fatcat Haliburtons getting rich at the expense of the troops. We don’t want any more scandals. And we certainly don’t want gay bashing preachers leading double lives and child molesters . So get out and stay out.And maybe Nancy along with Hilary will have the acumen to give the Whitehouse another lick of paint . White indeed – to wipe out the dirt that has been smeared all over it !!!

Leave a Reply